I started reading it. But I couldn't go on. I know it was short, but he just kept babbling about god. I hate it when the only arguement that a person has for a contraversial topic is "because god is against it". As soon as someone proves that there is a god maybe I can accept it. But whether or not there even is a god is a completely different arguement. That's like saying abortion is wrong because the chicken came before the egg.