Presenting the nonexistent dog that the neighbors don't own

[note to self, that is supposed to be an image and you should figure out serverage so it can be so again]
It's odd, usually they keep him locked in the bathroom for hours or perhaps even days at a time. But twice lately we've seen him peeking out the blinds like this.

Since January we've been telling the office that these people have a dog, and since January the office has been going "dur they didn't register one so they must not have one!" If Sarah and Ted have to pay 20 bucks a month to be allowed to have Peaches, who is the world's quietest dog EVER, then these guys should have to pay to be allowed to have this whining monstrosity.

Ahh, if only the complex management actually cared about enforcing rules. Did I mention that the other day the manager said to our faces that our safety here at Wyckford Commons was in no way, shape or form her concern? That was fun!

Also, Sir Burlypants Of Oregonia, if you ever told me which stickers you wanted, I never saw! You must choose! CHOOOOOSE!

The continuing saga of Dyckford Commons

Teenagers or possibly adults are setting off fireworks outside.

BY THROWING THEM AT A BUILDING.

To quote mecha: "This place is surreal."

Also, earlier we took photos of that dog to the office. The managerbitch responded by saying that neighbors continue to say they do not have a dog, and that she has sent people in there who have seen no dog, and that she personally has to see the dog before she can do anything. Then she angrily asked "what do you want me to do, shoot the dog in the head and get it out of the apartment?" Um, no, we're asking you to enforce the rules. Are those two things the same in your world?