napoleonherself: (trout)
[personal profile] napoleonherself
I find it incredibly harrassing when people add my LJ to their friends list and I don't want them to. I mean, this is MY journal, and THEY think they have some kind of right to add me and then read me RIGHT ON THEIR FRIENDS PAGE! This is horribly invasive, and, frankly, I think it's horribly unfair as well. If I don't want my journal to be on someone else's friends page, I should be able to take it off. After all, it's MY journal. Why should someone ELSE control whether THEY can see it on THEIR friends page?

...that, at least, is what a lot of LJers seem to think. Grow up, children. A) you don't get to decide who reads your PUBLIC entries. This is what is meant by the concept of PUBLIC. B) where the hell do you get off thinking YOU can control SOMEONE ELSE'S account? My, my, you certainly are important in your own little worlds, aren't you...

I can vaguely see the logic of removing or hiding friends-of who haven't been active in years, or even these "serial adder" types that apparently injure others so horribly by mass-adding LJfriends for odd reasons, if indeed the injury is so great that it troubles the poor victims night and day. But really. "OMG WHO ARE YOU I DO NOT KNOW YOU NOW I EDIT YOUR FRIENDS LIST AND REMOVE MYSELF FROM IT" Yeah. This, truly, is in the spirit of community. Bravo.

In other news, I might get to practice driving today! This summer I might get to work an easyish job for $9.50 an hour, $11 weekends, but I can't get to it if I don't GET MY LICENSE ALREADY... (and for perspective, my old job netted me $8.54 after my raise and cost-of-living increase, and poor ol' mom makes $8.50 at her BETTER-PAYING job. Tee hee.)

F33t.

Date: 2004-03-06 10:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steaksammich.livejournal.com
You are a bad person!! Does that mean I get to kick you?

Date: 2004-03-06 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] napoleonherself.livejournal.com
Nope! It means that I get to kick you!

*does so repeatedly*

Date: 2004-03-06 12:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moe4eyed.livejournal.com
It's possible I misunderstood the issue, but I thought that people wanted the ability to hide individual users from appearing on their "friend of" list, not the ability to remove themselves from the others' "friends" list

Date: 2004-03-06 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] napoleonherself.livejournal.com
I'm honestly not sure myself. Some people talked about it in terms of harrassment, which makes it sound like they wanted the friends-of-ing to go away entirely, but other people were definitely talking about hiding.

Either way, it boggles the mind that anyone could be such a control freak as to be upset about what OTHER people have chosen to do with THEIR OWN friends lists.

Date: 2004-03-12 07:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-rommy772.livejournal.com
*grins* So does this mean I can add you? :-p

Date: 2004-03-12 08:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] napoleonherself.livejournal.com
NO NO NO OMG THAT IS HARASSMENT

...by which I mean sure. I've always considered meaddage to be up to the person adding, not some privilege that I get to grant only to the worthy 'cause I'm all special like that. I AM SO INDIE YO

Profile

blarg

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 04:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios