A thought.

Nov. 8th, 2006 11:55 pm
[personal profile] napoleonherself
I just came across that tired old chestnut that if you don't vote, you don't get to complain about the results. As someone who did not vote this year, I feel the need to engage in a little thought experiment.

First of all, wow congratulations on being the Grand High Decider on who gets to talk about what. You are so special. I wish I were that special.

Second of all, what if the vote is pointless where you are? What if you are a Democrat in an area where the vast majority of the population is Republican? Do you really have to cast your worthless vote in order to be allowed to speak?

What if candidates are unopposed in your district? What if there is no candidate from "your" party to vote for? Do you really have to go write in your vote for Mickey Mouse in order to be allowed to speak?

What if you live in State A and you want to complain about the election in State B? Do you really have to cast an unrelated-to-the-issue vote in order to be allowed to speak?

What if you're legally barred from voting? Are you just not allowed to speak?

What if you were unexpectedly physically unable to get to the polling place? Are you just not allowed to speak?

What if you realize only AFTER the election that you have concerns? Are you just not allowed to speak?


Am I just not allowed to speak?


I realize that the best way to maintain your position as Grand High Decider on who gets to talk about what means that you can never, ever, ever address my concerns. Good heavens, that might be almost the same as admitting that you could be wrong! Maybe everyone gets to express their opinions -- even if they didn't vote!

But I ask all the same.

Am I just not allowed to speak?

Date: 2006-11-09 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steaksammich.livejournal.com
I think people who say that just don't bother to stop and think about how stupid they sound when they do say that. Because apparently when we don't waste our time voting, we lose the whole free speech thing. Does that mean we lose our other rights too? By their logic I'm guessing the two of us no longer have the right to bear arms either.

Date: 2006-11-09 05:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] napoleonherself.livejournal.com
To say nothing of the right to freedom of religion.

You are now a Zoroastrian. Don't argue; you don't have any choice in the matter anyway. PRAY TO ZOROASTRI. Or, you know, whoever. Zorro maybe?

Profile

blarg

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 10:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios